2011年6月17日 星期五

Lenin's Tomb: The taxpayer (kenef)

文章連結:http://leninology.blogspot.com/2011/06/taxpayer.html


這篇文章提到,當我們談起公務員薪酬或者增加公共開支時,很喜歡抱著「納稅人」這個身份,抱怨自己付出了多少而有些人(如公務員、領綜援者等)卻得到來自「納稅人」的津貼(subsidy)。 作者指出這種說法假設了有些人不是「納稅人」,但現實是所有人都有交稅:不論是公務員一樣要交的薪俸稅,還是消費時我們要交的間接稅。To speak of "the taxpayer" is in this sense meaningless, since it includes everyone.

回到香港,公務員加薪我們固然會聽到這種論調,但更普遍的是以「納稅人」身份去歧視拿政府津貼、沒有交入息稅的基層與綜援戶。其實在他們水漲船高的物價、高昂的租金中,已經納了稅給政府。我們還要信那種只有中產交的入息稅、大財團交的利得稅才是「納稅」的鬼話嗎?



The taxpayer posted by lenin

One of the advantages of CiF is that in the comments section you get to see the shibboleths of reaction condensed, vocalised, lyricised, even screamed in block capitals and exclamation points. One of the talking points that always come up whenever you discuss public sector workers is "the taxpayer". The sovereign taxpayer. The over-burdened, pushed-beyond-the-point-of-reason taxpayer, to be precise. It goes roughly like this:

You public sector workers always have your hand out. You get better pay than the rest of us, and you have generous gold-plated pensions. When anyone tries to take the slightest of your privileges away, you throw your toys out of the pram and go on strike. But I am not prepared to pay for your perky lifestyle any more. What we can't afford, you can't have. The taxpayer subsidises you to 100%, and the taxpayer isn't going to go on supporting your selfish, I'm-alright-jack lifestyles. A bit of hardship would do you lazy jobsworths some good. Market discipline. Let's see you and your red friends get by like the rest of us, uncoddled by the state and your friends in the meeja-hideen... (etc etc).

 You think I'm exaggerating, don't you? Well, the point is how "the taxpayer" is invoked here as a relevant political category. You'll notice that, implicit in this is a suggestion that there are people who aren't taxpayers. But public sector workers pay taxes, not only on their income but on consumption. In fact, there is no one who doesn't pay taxes. The unemployed pay tax. Children pay tax. Prisoners pay tax. Even the homeless pay tax. To speak of "the taxpayer" is in this sense meaningless, since it includes everyone. And self-evidently, not everyone shares the political attitudes expressed by "the taxpayer" above. The question of what "the taxpayer" is willing to pay for is a political question, depending on who the taxpayer is, and what other social categories and classes s/he identifies as. But implicit in this is the idea that the taxpayer is supporting a public sector which is purely parasitic. Public sector workers are "subsidised" by "the taxpayer"; as if, in addition to not paying taxes, they add no value to the economy. "The taxpayer" is thus, by definition, always over-taxed (even if there are quite a few who are under-taxed). The subject-position expressed in this figure of "the taxpayer" is that of a lower middle class trader, shopkeeper or white van man, anxious to hold on to his wad and not pay for anything he isn't getting.

沒有留言:

張貼留言